Saturday, February 28, 2009

Eric McFadden, What Did Strickland Know and When Did He Know It and other Sundries

It appears Joe the Plumber is suing.

He's not hemming and hawing now. He's suing. He hooked up with Judicial Watch for some aspect of the suit, though I assume (or hope) that's a side-thing about FOIA or the like, and that he has a regular private interest attorney handling his suit.


As I've reported before, after I initiated the request that Eric McFadden's emails and internet traffic be investigated for illicit and profane use with Governor Ted Strickland's legal counsel, the individual behind Joe the Plumber's privacy invasion was none other than Helen Jones-Kelley.

Helen Jones-Kelley has resigned as director of the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services, Gov. Ted Strickland’s office announced today, Dec. 17.

State Inspector General Tom Charles found that Jones-Kelley, of Clayton, improperly authorized state database searches for personal information on Samuel Joseph “Joe the Plumber” Wurzelbacher during the presidential campaign.

Strickland suspended Jones-Kelley for a month without pay on Nov. 20 in the wake of Charles’ report.

I'm plugging along slowly when I have time in my quest to resend the FOIA to get the Eric McFadden electronic and paper trail on all of Eric McFadden's communications and internet traffic reports that preceded Helen Jones-Kelley's "transfer" and the subsequent "faith-based" re-hiring of McFadden for in the Clinton/Strickland run for the White House.

I hope they're smart enough to give me the trail I'm looking for and defer to the wise philosophy of letting people individually fall to save their larger agenda. Discovery in a civil suit is whole other matter..requests vs. demands and such. It may well open up a can of worms they really don't want opened. Call this a hunch, but I think there's a fairly decent chance that somewhere in that trail, there is also communications with McFadden offering the services of his prostitutes to state officials.

My second round of FOIA requests should be going out this weekend.

Stay tuned!

Rights of Catholic Healthcare Workers Now Nationally Threatened


In the ongoing battle against gog and magog, as expected, the Democrats are taking away the abortion "conscience clause" and ultimately the rights to the livelihoods of Catholic doctors, nurses, pharmacists.

What does it all mean?

It means with respect to killing another human being, if your conscience works, you've got to leave your job. If you're in medical school, you've got to switch majors. Gone will be the days when faithful Catholics can work in healthcare.


Of course, Mitt Romney did this in Massachusetts years ago.

Romney spokesman Eric Fehrnstrom previously said the governor supports exempting Catholic and private hospitals because it "respects the views of health care facilities that are guided by moral principles on this issue."


Romney, having moral principles guided by political expediency, sold the constitutional freedoms of Catholics when the rogue anti-Catholic Massachusetts legislature pushed back.

"On that basis I have instructed the Department of Public Health to follow the conclusion of my own legal counsel and to adopt that sounder view," Romney said, according to an AP report.

Not only did the Catholic Bishops go along with it - attorney general Tom Reilly, who said this:

The new law will go into effect on December 14 and Attorney General Tom Reilly, a Democrat who is running for governor next year, said he would make sure it's strongly enforced against all hospitals.


- the Massachusetts Bishops hired to marshal from within.


Tom Reilly is right in place to to make sure Obama, Pelosi, Sebelius, Kmiec, Catholics United and the rest of Magog's chain gang carry out the orders in Massachusetts.

Catholic League president Bill Donohue discussed the ramifications of this action:

“This regulation gives health care workers the right to be free from discriminatory edicts invoked by those who have no respect for their conscience rights. No one in the health care field should ever be compelled by law to perform or assist in a procedure that violates his or her conscience. This should be an elementary right, yet there are those who want to trespass on it.

“This would be another step in the wrong direction for an administration which is promoting abortion by overturning the Mexico City Policy, promising to support the United Nations Population Fund and considering the nomination of radical abortion rights supporter Kansas Gov. Kathleen Sebelius to be the Secretary of HHS. This action would be the most offensive since it compromises the rights of Catholics to act according to their conscience.


Sadly, the victims of the emnity of all that is sanctified and holy have no idea Who and What they fight against.

Good luck to them!


She shall crush thy head, and you shall strike at her heel."

Thursday, February 26, 2009

Crawling out of the Woodwork

Debra Haffner, former President of SIECUS has posted a comment in this post

She's taking issue with making the sexual abuse of children promoted in SIECUS relevant to her vocational devotion as the President of SIECUS.

The principles of the Many-Boy Love Association are what they are and nobody would become President of the initiative while claiming you were against child abuse. Life just doesn't work that way.

The principles of SEICUS include enticing parents to masturbate their children. SIECUS also promotes pedophilia.


http://www.thefreelibrary.com/1980:+the+SIECUS%2FUppsala+principles+basic+to+education+for...-a0118957421


**UPDATE


Thought I'd post quote from this page - just for the record.


A passage from Debra Haffner’s article “Safe Sex and Teens” in the September-October 1989 SIECUS Report is quite open about what it wants for our children. “Colleagues and I have fantasized about a national ‘petting project’ for teenagers….A partial list of safe sex practices for teens could include: Talking, Flirting, Dancing, Hugging, Kissing, Necking, Massaging, Caressing, Undressing each other, Masturbation alone, Masturbation in front of a partner, Mutual masturbation. Teens could surely come up with their own list of activities.”

Based on magazine ads, movies and television…yes…teens “could surely come up with” quite a list of sexual activities. But is that what we want our children to do? Indulge in sexual promiscuity?

Even more amazing than the list of extracurricular sex suggestions from Haffner’s article is the general premise of SIECUS that these activities are a form of abstinence from sex. In fact, some creative educators actually coined a special word for this brand of abstinence…outercourse…as opposed to intercourse.

In the old days, before enlightenment by the likes of SIECUS and Planned Parenthood, these “outercourse” activities were just the types of activities that led many a teen into intercourse. If avoiding intercourse is their true goal, one has to wonder why Haffner and her colleagues felt that empowering teens to explore highly charged eroticism is preferable to abstinence.

The history of SIECUS provides endless examples of this type of sexual conundrum…having more sex to avoid having sex. In 1977, Time began its article, “Cradle-to-Grave Intimacy,” quoting Mary Calderone saying that a child has a fundamental right “to know about sexuality and to be sexual”.

“Cultivating” the sexuality of children was of prime importance to Calderone and others. Adopting a Kinseyan philosophy that children are sexual from birth, few in this circle of “sexperts” saw any need to restrict the sexual behaviors of people…and children. Their concerns actually focused on repelling any attempts to limit or restrain sex, seeing these as repressive and counter to human design.

In 1981, Calderone co-authored The Family Book about Sexuality that asserted, “The major effects of such incidents [molestation] are caused not by the event itself but by the outraged, angry fearful, and shocked reactions of the adults who learn of it….It is these immoderate reactions which may cause whatever psychological damage occurs.”

Today, SIECUS guidelines for sex education are 112 pages long. Read carefully. You will find Calderone’s and Haffner’s same philosophy on sex underlying the core ideas of SIECUS and the activities they recommend for children.


and here

Level 1 (Ages 5 to 8):
  • Both girls and boys have body parts that feel good when touched.

  • Vaginal intercourse occurs when a man and a woman place the penis inside the vagina.

  • Human beings experience different kinds of loving.

  • Most men and women are heterosexual, which means they will be attracted to and fall in love with someone of the other gender.

  • Some men and women are homosexual, which means they will be attracted to and fall in love with someone of the same gender.

  • Homosexuals are also known as gay men and lesbian women.

  • Many people live in lifetime committed relationships, even though they may not be legally married.

  • Touching and rubbing one's own genitals to feel good is called masturbation.

  • Some boys and girls masturbate and others do not.

  • Masturbation should be done in a private place.

  • Adults often kiss, hug, touch and engage in other sexual behavior with one another to show caring and to share sexual pleasure.

Level 2 (Ages 9 to 12):
  • Sexual intercourse provides pleasure.

  • Sexual orientation refers to whether a person is heterosexual, homosexual, or bisexual.

  • A bisexual person is attracted to both men and women.

  • Why a person has a particular sexual orientation is not now known.

  • Homosexual, heterosexual, and bisexual people are alike except for their sexual attraction.

  • Gay men and lesbians can adopt children or have their own children.

  • Masturbation is often the first way a person experiences sexual pleasure.

  • Many boys and girls begin to masturbate for sexual pleasure during puberty.

  • Couples have different ways to share sexual pleasure with each other.

  • Being sexual with another person usually involves more than sexual intercourse.

  • A woman faced with an unintended pregnancy can carry the pregnancy to term and raise the baby, place the baby for adoption, or have an abortion to end the pregnancy.

  • Abortion is legal in the United States.

  • Abortion must be performed by a physician or other licensed health provider.

  • A legal abortion is very safe.

Who'd believe Haffner became President as some kind of shrewd boycott of an organization that pushes intercourse and abortion on a nine year old among various other pedophile acts.


My mother did not raise a fool.

Wednesday, February 25, 2009

Saint John Kerry

John Kerry is now a Saint....CAN YOU BELIEVE THIS ?

On a Saturday afternoon, in Washington, D. C., Senator John Kerry's campaign manager visited the Cardinal of the Catholic Cathedral.

He told the Cardinal that John Kerry would be attending the next day's sermon, and he asked if the Cardinal would kindly point out Kerry to the congregation and say a few words that would include calling Kerry a saint.

The Cardinal replied, "No. I don't really like the man, and there are issues of conflict with the Catholic Church over certain of Kerry's views." Kerry's manager then said, "Look. I'll write a check here and now for a donation of $100,000 to your church if you'll just tell the congregation you see Kerry as a saint."

The Cardinal thought about it and said, "Well, the church can use the money, so I'll work your request into tomorrow's sermon." As Kerry's campaign manager promised, Senator Kerry appeared for the Sunday sermon and seated himself prominently at the edge of the main isle.

And, during the sermon, as promised, the Cardinal pointed out that Senator Kerry was present.

Then the Cardinal went on to explain to the congregation -- "While Senator Kerry's presence is probably an honor to some, he is not my favorite person. Some of his views are contrary to those of the church, and he tends to flip-flop on many other views. John Kerry is a petty, self-absorbed hypocrite, a thumb sucker, and a nit-wit. John Kerry is also a serial liar, a cheat, and a thief.

John Kerry is the worst example of a Catholic I have ever personally witnessed. He turned on his buddies in Vietnam. He wrote a book and portrayed himself in the best light when he was a traitor to his fellow servicemen. He has lied about his military record and had the gall to put himself in for medal's (including one that does not even exist).

He married for money and is using it to lie to the American people. He also has a reputation for shirking his senatorial obligations both here, in Washington, and in Massachusetts. He simply is not to be trusted."

The Cardinal completed his view of Kerry with, "But, when compared to Senator Ted Kennedy, Senator Kerry is a saint."

Phenomenal Reflection...

Getting Serious About Lent


Because of original sin, an inner force will always move us in the wrong direction. Continual effort is necessary to control the inner movement of our ego, and allow the presence of grace to take control of our thoughts, desires and actions. The battle of the spiritual life is like walking in a river against the current. If we do not continue to walk or grab on to a rock, the current will carry us in the opposite direction. Lent provides us with an excellent opportunity to strengthen ourselves so that we can keep walking against the current.


Do read the whole thing.

Happy Ash Wednesday

I'm so glad Lent is here. I started my day with the Sacrament of Confession and Ashes at Arch Street.

One thing I'll say for the priests there, they are devoted to the Sacrament of Confession.

As they made the sign of the cross on my forehead and said "turn from sin and follow the Gospel", I thought to myself, the sad thing about this place is they never teach their flock what constitutes sin and therefore, their flock never turns from it.

Thank you Jesus for the many brave souls who corrected my errors and taught me Authentic Catholicism.

I hope your Lent is off to a prayerful start.

Here's a reflection from a talented friend of mine - followed by Readings.

"A New Heart"

"Create in me a clean heart, O God, and put a new and right spirit in me."
(Psalm 51:10)

Lord, during this Lenten season, you call me to love you with ALL MY HEART. I can't do this on my own, so I come to you and ask you to create the heart YOU desire for me.
I ask you to
... heal my wounded heart
.... calm my anxious heart
.... open my selfish heart
.... comfort my broken heart
.... cleanse my sinful heart
.... direct my confused heart
.... answer my questioning heart
.... melt my unforgiving heart
.... feed my hungry heart
.... befriend my lonely heart.

I also pray that you would
... encourage my compassionate heart
.... strengthen my patient heart
.... sustain my merciful heart
.... foster my generous heart
.... inspire my creative heart
.... maintain my grateful heart
.... overflow my joyful heart.

In Ezekiel 36:26 the Lord says, "A new heart will I give you and a new spirit I will put within you.”

Dear Lord,
Thank you that you will renew my heart -- and the hearts of all those who seek you.
Our hearts can become hard and impenetrable because of the events that occur in our lives. Each day please touch those dark areas of our hearts.

And Lord, when our hearts are open and full of light, sustain them. Give us the grace and desire to give that love back to YOU -- then share it with others... and ourselves. Encourage us to continually work toward following your GREAT commandments: "You shall love the Lord your God, with all your heart, with all your soul, and with all your mind... You shall love your neighbor as yourself. " (Matthew 22:37-39)



Reading 1

Dt 30:15-20
Moses said to the people: "Today I have set before you
life and prosperity, death and doom. If you obey the commandments of the LORD, your God, which I enjoin on you today, loving him, and walking in his ways, and keeping his commandments, statutes and decrees, you will live and grow numerous, and the LORD, your God, will bless you in the land you are entering to occupy. If, however, you turn away your hearts and will not listen, but are led astray and adore and serve other gods, I tell you now that you will certainly perish; you will not have a long life on the land that you are crossing the Jordan to enter and occupy. I call heaven and earth today to witness against you: I have set before you life and death, the blessing and the curse. Choose life, then, that you and your descendants may live, by loving the LORD, your God, heeding his voice, and holding fast to him. For that will mean life for you, a long life for you to live on the land that the LORD swore he would give to your fathers Abraham, Isaac and Jacob."


Responsorial Psalm

Ps 1:1-2, 3, 4 and 6
R. (40:5a) Blessed are they who hope in the Lord.
Blessed the man who follows not the counsel of the wicked
Nor walks in the way of sinners, nor sits in the company of the insolent, But delights in the law of the LORD and meditates on his law day and night.
R. Blessed are they who hope in the Lord.
He is like a tree planted near running water, That yields its fruit in due season, and whose leaves never fade. Whatever he does, prospers.
R. Blessed are they who hope in the Lord.
Not so the wicked, not so; they are like chaff which the wind drives away. For the LORD watches over the way of the just,
but the way of the wicked vanishes.
Gospel Lk 9:22-25
Jesus said to his disciples: "The Son of Man must suffer greatly and be rejected by the elders, the chief priests, and the scribes,
and be killed and on the third day be raised." Then he said to all, "If anyone wishes to come after me, he must deny himself
and take up his cross daily and follow me. For whoever wishes to save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for my sake will save it. What profit is there for one to gain the whole world yet lose or forfeit himself?"

Catholic Proabort Politicians are Despondent; Petition/Counter Petition


With the illumination that Pro-Life Catholics desire to give momentum to Catholic Politicians faithful to the tenets of our religion, abortion advocating Catholic politicians are despondent at the shocking news that they're betraying their faith.

They have never heard this insulting revelation before from the rock they're under.

And, they're dismayed that people are fundraising to accomplish their political aspirations.

Where in America has this ever been done before.

Senator Kerry is whimpering in the corner with a spokesperson who doesn't have her Bernadin seamless garment talking points memorized

“At a time when the whole cloth of Catholic teachings demands we work together to find answers for so many who are suffering in this world, it’s disappointing to see incendiary political fundraising rather than good-faith efforts to promote the common good and work together to reduce the number of abortions,” Kerry spokeswoman Whitney Smith wrote in an e-mail."

You know...the whole cloth.

The whole nine yards.

The whichamacall it.........The cloth without the holes.


In a good-faith effort to promote the whole common good cloth, Catholics United is circulating a petition on behalf of the catatonic Catholic proaborts.


I can trump this cartoon.

United Catholics Circulate Counter-Petition to President Barack Obama
to denounce divisive tactics of Catholics United.

Calls for return of money for inappropriate use of of government agencies
and unfaithful Catholic periodicals to ambush faithful Roman Catholics


Dear President Obama;

Once again, operatives with strong partisan ties are misusing faith to achieve their political ends.

Today, the unfaithful organization Catholics United run by an official of your campaign, Elizabeth Frawley Bagley was limping along trying to get traction out of a story that Roman Catholics are tired of leadership misrepresenting dogma in the public square and are fundraising to give momentum to politicians who embrace our ideals to give us a voice on Capitol Hill.

I know what you're thinking: It's as crazy for faithful Catholics to have taxation and want representation on Capitol Hill as it is AfroAmericans. Yet, as a wise man once said, we have dreams too, that someday folks will judge Catholics by the content of our character. We shall not be deterred. We will not be intimidated. Our political dreams, of course, are deflated by a 2000 year history of martyrdom - but oddly, the gravitas of evangelizing in the public square only gets more zealous. Go figure.

Considering the divisive tactics this rat pack initiative has participated in , our feelings are hurt. In fact, we're so paralyzed and depressed we are being spoon-fed soup.

You have officially stated that you reject divisive politics and that's a good first step but more needs to be done, especially if their grassroots adviser God O Thunder gets out of jail. Together with our friends in the Roman Curia, can you send us 76.9 million applications for the witness protection program? All people of faith have reason to be offended by Catholics United divisive tone.

We are calling on President Obama to 1) clarify to all those who are stalked and threatened that he does not support these attacks on the Catholic faith and 2) ask Elizabeth Frawley Bagley to return all the funds raised by this campaign or put them to good use in this time of economic crisis by donating them to Catholic Advocate.

Please sign my petition and ask President Obama to help right the wrongs of these degrading tactics.

United Catholics is a group of hundreds of thousands Catholics.

Monday, February 23, 2009

Hell Hath No Fury Like The Feuerher

The new initiative "Catholic Advocate," whose goal is to expose politicians "who hide their pro-abortion record behind a smokescreen of faith," confirmed to CNA that they do have the support of Senator Sam Brownback for their initiative.

But on Friday, Joe Feuerher, a staff writer of the National Catholic Reporter, questioned the authenticity of the letter, quoting Brownback's spokesman Brian Hart, who said that "our chief of staff ... had never seen, heard of, or approved it."

On Monday, Catholic Advocate sent CNA a copy of the email approving the letter from Senator Brownback. The email, which involves the names of other individuals not relevant to the story, was dated February 29, 2008 to Matt Schenk, of HSP Direct, clearly stating that "the Brownback/Catholic Advocate appeal" was "ok, approved."

Regarding the statements of Brian Hart quoted by the Reporter, Glen Chambers, chief of staff for Senator Brownback, explained that "I think we've gotten to the bottom of the confusion over the mail piece. Neither the Senator nor I had seen the letter or were aware of it. I figured out that you did get permission to use his name on the piece from a former campaign staffer in February of last year." Chambers also said there would not be future mailings using the Senator's name.

The CNA story also gives credence to the character assassinations that are reserved for Catholics who assent to the authority of the Deposit of Faith.

In the his story, Feuerher takes special aim at Deal Hudson, whom he describes as a "conservative Catholic activist and Republican political operative." Feuerher dedicates part of his article to focusing attention on his own controversial report from 2004 that detailed an inappropriate sexual encounter Hudson had revealed and apologized for several years ago.

In 2004, Feuerher deflected criticism that his intention was character assassination by saying that he just followed "where the story led me."

Nevertheless, earlier this year, Catholic blogs called attention to the Hudson story by saying that the coverage the National Catholic Reporter gave to the scandal surrounding Eric McFadden was insufficient in comparison.

I love the Freudian slip in Feuerherd's name. Considering the sex scandals right under the noses of the National Catholic Reporter, I'm amazed they are so bold.

I wouldn't wish the despicable characters at the NCR crowd upon McFadden's family.

But, let's mark the occasion: There are obscene pictures of a minor taken in his his wife's car and plenty of lewd and lascivious sex details in the public domain that the National Catholic Reporter story didn't "take them".

Catholics United is never associated with the sexual criminal and pedophile they sent to five parishes in Ohio to "protect children". NCR has yet to ask the question as to whether the sexual socipath went inside of the parish building on the directives of the DNC and their cronies at "Catholics United".

Feuerherd did not respond to my question about about Kennedy initiating the story. I'm terribly sorry that Kennedy is sick and I pray for his health and his conversion. But, let's have the decency to be honest. There's never been any mention in the National Catholic Reporter of the Kennedy's canoodlings when he drove off the bridge and left the woman to die. The story never seems to "take them there" even when its the Kennedys using the resources of the National Catholic Reporter to intimidate.

There is an end to letting the proabortion lobby of the DNC use political terrorism at a periodical with the name Catholic on it.

Sunday, February 22, 2009

Father George Rutler's February 22 Column


The discovery of penicillin as an antibiotic has been called the most important medical discovery of the last thousand years. The extraction from mold of the genus Penicillium has saved at least two hundred million lives so far. Penicillin has been around for millions of years but its antibacterial properties were noticed for the first time on September 28, 1928, when Alexander Fleming saw bacteria-free mold in a laboratory dish which he had retrieved from a pile of rubbish in St. Mary's Hospital, Paddington, London. He paid attention. No one until then had.

Fleming was the son of a Scottish farmer and, learning Latin as a Catholic student, he knew the meaning of "age quod agis." As a maxim, "do what you are doing" means to pay attention to ordinary things and extraordinary things may result. When Jesus walked among men, most did not pay much attention to him precisely because he seemed ordinary. "He sighed from the depth of his spirit" and said, "Why does this generation seek a sign? Amen I say to you, no sign will be given to this generation" (Mark 8:12). The truth behind miracles is in the often unnoticed details. For instance, the miraculous feedings of the five thousand and four thousand were not as important as the twelve and seven baskets of fragments left over, which represent the Apostles and the sacraments. "Do you not yet understand or comprehend? Are your hearts hardened? Do you have eyes and not see, ears and not hear?" (Mark 8:17-18).

Lent is a time to increase the power of perception. Small acts of penance and good confessions in this season are meant to increase that power. Instead of attempting extraordinary things, it is better to do more intensely the ordinary practices of Christian life: prayer, almsgiving, study, and evangelism. "Age quod agis."

Jesus asked, "Have I been so long with you, Philip, and do you still not understand?" (John 14:9). Shortly before Cardinal Dulles died last December, he reflected on how "doing what you are doing" with love in the normal process of living can lead to the most remarkable discoveries of God's power in human weakness. It is simply a matter of paying attention:

"Suffering and diminishment are not the greatest of evils but are normal ingredients in life, especially in old age. They are to be accepted as elements of a full human existence. Well into my ninetieth year I have been able to work productively. As I become increasingly paralyzed and unable to speak, I can identify with the many paralytics and mute persons in the Gospels, grateful for the loving and skillful care I receive and for the hope of everlasting life in Christ. If the Lord now calls me to a period of weakness, I know well that his power can be made perfect in infirmity. 'Blessed be the name of the Lord.'"


If you enjoy reading these newsletters, please express your support with a Donation, of any amount, to the Church of Our Saviour.

The Church of Our Saviour uses ParishPay to process online donations.

Our website is www.OurSaviourNYC.org.

Stumping for the Supreme Court, Kmiec Calls the Pope "Intrusive"

Doug Kmiec says Jurists should lack a moral compass to accurately interpret law.


I'd say his latest screed, he's trying to prove as a supreme court jurist, he'd interpret Constitutional religious freedom as legal intrusions:

In his piece Prof. Kmiec implied that the Pope exaggerated or at least did not measure the consequences of his words when he told Nancy Pelosi that "jurists," in addition to legislators, must work "in cooperation with all men and women of good will in creating a just system of laws capable of protecting human life at all stages of its development."

According to Kmiec, such a statement “has the potential, at least theoretically, to empty the U.S. Supreme Court of all five of its Catholic jurists, and perhaps all other Catholics who sit on the bench in the lower federal and state courts.”

The Pepperdine professor suggests the Pope, instead, could take "a different, less intrusive course," by "continuing to observe the difference between a jurist and a legislator."

He'd make one hell of an Ambassador to the Vatican eh?

Archbishop Chaput weighs on Pelosi's eligibility for Communion:

Cavuto also asked Archbishop Chaput if he would deny Holy Communion to Pelosi.

To which, the archbishop responded:

"Well, I’d like to talk to her if she’s coming to church in the Archdiocese of Denver and I’d say to her what I’d say to anyone, if you don’t accept what the Church teaches, you shouldn’t present yourself for Communion, because Communion means you’re in agreement with what the Church teaches, and, as I said to you earlier, that applies to all of us..."

Isn’t she boxed in by Catholic beliefs on the one hand and by a society that is pro-choice? Cavuto queried.

"Well I don’t think it’s a box to defend the truth and to stand up for what you know to be right, even if others in the community disagree with you, and being honest about our moral principles is a sign of maturity, is a sign of being a statesman.

"And I think that politicians are required to be both good Americans and good Catholics at the same time and to be convincing when they present the position of the community on basic human rights," the archbishop replied.

Referring to the issue of abortion, Archbishop Chaput said, "This is a human rights issue, from the point of view of the Church, and not a theological or religious perspective. Our religious perspective supports that, but that’s not the source of our belief about the sacredness of human life."



If it's invisible, is it really there?

"Cardinal's Turn on Pope Invisible"

The sky is falling.

Notorious dissenters Cardinal Walter Kasper, Cardinal Christoph Schönborn predicts the end of Christendom.


He doesn't eat breakfast with them.

When he meets people, they are not on the list of invitees.

He's eating on plates with gold rims.

Instead of asking for their opinion, he reads the files.

He prays and writes.

This story takes the cake. They want to blame the Pope for making decisions based on their incompetent diligence.

Saturday, February 21, 2009

The plot thickens

-----Original Message-----
From: cmmckinley@aol.com
To: jfeurhard@natcath.org
Cc: ckorzen@catholics-united.org; jsalt@catholics-united.org; tfox@ncronline.org
Sent: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 11:27 am
Subject: comfirm/deny



Joe,

Did Senator Kennedy's Office initiate a phone call to you regarding this story?

Thanks.




-----Original Message-----
From: cmmckinley@aol.com
To: jsalt@catholics-united.org
Cc: ckorzen@catholics-united.org; jfeuerherd@natcath.org
Sent: Sat, 21 Feb 2009 11:17 am
Subject: shooting a flare across your bow

James,

I noted with interest your quote in the Amy Sullivan article:

"
James Salt, director of organizing for the progressive organization Catholics United, thinks the USCCB has been prodded into focusing on FOCA by misinformation from conservative groups. "These right-wing organizations are deliberately misleading people in order to stoke the culture war," says Salt. "They're using this as a fundraising tool, as a way to gain up their relevancy. And unfortunately, some of these groups have the ear of certain bishops."

"Certain Bishops"? That's a bit of an understatement when the entire Conference of Catholic Bishops is ramping up efforts to put pressure against FOCA. Obama made it clear he intended to garner support to pass FOCA as one of his top priorities and we have no intention of laying low while he does it. The pro-life community intends to vehemently oppose and resist this radical offense to the dignity of human life.

I also find it fascinating that the National Catholic Reporter picked up on the story and added their own twist of attack.I know how much you guys like "accurate information" and since there appears to be a loose cannon on Brownback's staff making the foolish error of throwing orthodox Catholics under a bus by giving Feuerherd inaccurate information, I thought it worthwhile to drop you a line to recount for you that my recollection was that when the Brownback letter was produced, it was done with Brownback's permission.

Since I've been building the case that your phony baloney Catholic Alliance/Catholics United shtick is working with the DNC and the proabort politicians in it and using the National Catholic Reporter as a tool to attack Catholics whose compass is faithful to the tenets of the Catholic Religion - - I'd like to know if a Catholic politician made a phone call to the National Catholic Reporter to initiate their story. I'm going to find out and when I do, I'm going to add it to the pile of evidence - along with your most recent salvo at Bishop Naumann. Keep firing away boys!

Good day to you sir!

Carol McKinley

p.s. My most recent posts may be of interest to you:


Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good.

Catholics United.

Fishwrap rots from the head down.

Friday, February 20, 2009

Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good Had Two Dogs in the Race

Deal Hudson posted a link to the Catholic Key Blog reporting new information On Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good.

This new revelation gives a whole new meaning to Catholics United "parish protection program" sending the sexually disturbed psychopath Eric McFadden to parishes in Ohio to chase prolifers around in parking lots. It was courtesy of Barack Obama. This only adds fuel to my conviction that the Democrats are setting up machines within the US Government to haze and threaten Catholics loyal to the compass of the Catholic Church.


Elizabeth Frawley Bagley is the board chair of Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good. As reported here earlier, Bagley is anything but nonpartisan. In fact, she has given hundreds of thousands of dollars to the DNC and scores of pro-abortion Democrat politicians including Al Franken, Barbara Boxer, Claire McCaskill, Charles Schumer, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. She personally raised at least $350,000 for the Obama campaign and was a member of his national finance team according to an interview in the Nantucket Inquirer and Mirror.



....However, one day after the election, on November 5, Bagley sat for an interview on the internet broadcast Paltalk News. Host Gary Baumgarten introduced Bagley as the person "who was responsible for getting out the Catholic vote for Obama," - a claim she did not deny. In his synopsis of the show, Baumgarten also describes Bagley as "an official of the Barack Obama campaign."


Eric McFadden's inability to restrain his genitalia, wasn't his only restraint problem. He also had trouble restraining his tongue. He would openly say that his stalking and threats were backed by Nancy Pelosi, Hillary and Bill Clinton, Ted Strickland, Burns Strider, who were all poised to publicly assassinate the character and mission of prolife Catholics by way of plotted attacks of intimidation using government agencies, blogs,the media and other methods of retaliation.

God O Thunder would claim to be invincible and backed by the DNC.

Hillary certainly gave McFadden's claim veracity.

Hillary herself:


At a convention of left-wing bloggers last summer, Hillary Clinton announced, “We are . . . putting together a network in the blogosphere.”

Her remarks became public only three weeks ago, on Oct. 2, when an anonymous person posted a shaky, hand-held videotape of her speech on YouTube. In it, Hillary bragged that she had helped create “institutions” which had produced a left-wing “network in theblogosphere” capable of “matching” the alleged “advantage of the other side.”
They called their "institution" the "Faith Working Group". The Democrats had Alexia operating Obama's "faith" machine and "Catholics United" operated Hillary's. Both Groups are part and parcel of "Catholics in Alliance for the Common Good". They had two dogs in the race.


The Democrat's "Faith Working Group", was indeed led by none other than Ms. Pelosi:



Burns Strider, one of the Democratic Party’s leading strategists on winning over evangelicals and other values-driven voters, will join Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) as she prepares to launch her 2008 presidential campaign.

Strider now heads religious outreach for the House Democratic Caucus, and is the lead staffer for the Democrats’ Faith Working Group, headed by incoming Majority Whip James Clyburn (D-S.C.).


Burns Strider blabbed about the group here.

We have direct lines to the candidate. There's interaction; decisions are being made. The faith office is at the table every morning, fully integrated into the campaign. Faith work has to be substantive, it has to be real in people's lives and it has to be taken seriously."

The Democrats know that they can win when they talk about their faith. The evidence was in the 2006 midterm elections when some Democratic candidates made their faith an important part of their platform.

Strider says, "We did it with Heath Shuler, Ted Strickland, Bob Casey, Tim Kaine and others by talking about their faith and no one turned into a pillar of salt. We have showcased the last few years that being authentically Democratic and authentically faithful is not only compatible, but powerful. All of these Democratic candidates are authentic and that's a good thing for our nation."

I'm all the more convinced they were all "sitting around the table" with "direct lines to the candidates" right at Ted Strickland's office and McFadden was using the resources of the State of Ohio to execute their plans.

The machine was and is well greased by the money from George Soros and the DNC.

It turns out that after I asked Strickland's legal team to check out McFadden's computer and they temporarily protected McFadden, the infamous Helen Jones-Kelley signed McFadden's "transfer". (I don't think that's going to play out to Strickland's advantage when I send my file to the OIG?)

Here's the kicker:

"Our practice is when someone is thrust quickly into the public spotlight, we often take a look" at them, Jones-Kelley said, citing a case where a lottery winner was found to owe past-due child support. "Our practice is to basically look at what is coming our way."

This from a woman who involved herself in shuffling Eric McFadden's after I filed a complaint about his computer diddlings.

When Strickland stumped for the job of Hillary Clinton's VP, he plucked McFadden out of the safety net and put the "Sullivant Guy" (McFadden) into a key role in the Democratic "Faith-Based Initiatives".


With the latest news that radical in-love-with-abortion Kathleen Sebelius is being tapped for Obama's Health and Human Services Chief, Catholics are publicizing Sebelius's abortion agenda and Soros and the DNC continue to fire salvos by way of the useful idiots at Catholics United.

“Had Mr. Donohue been interested in presenting a full accounting of the facts, he would have mentioned Gov. Sebelius's tireless support for children's health care and education, and her efforts to provide public financing for adoption and pregnancy support centers – all components of an effective pro-life agenda that can find broad support among the American people. Had Mr. Donohue been interested in presenting a full accounting of the facts, he would have mentioned that the number of abortions in Kansas declined by 12.6% from 2001 to 2007, due in part to Gov. Sebelius's advocacy for pregnant women and struggling families.”

“Like Kansas City Archbishop Joseph Naumann – who often seems more interested in scoring political points against Gov. Sebelius than crafting effective abortion policy within the reality of politics – Mr. Donohue is doing a disservice to those Americans who will benefit from Gov. Sebelius's leadership as Health and Human Services Secretary. We remind U.S. Catholics and other observers that the Catholic League is part of a right-wing political movement at the margins of the Catholic community, and urge them to view Mr. Donohue and his comments in this context.”


“None of these archbishops overreacted. Not only does Sebelius support the now outlawed practice of killing babies who are 80 percent born, so-called partial-birth abortion, she has accepted donations from one of the most notorious practitioners of this Nazi-style act—Dr. George Tiller. Moreover, she even hosted a dinner for him in the Governor’s Mansion.

Tiller has no shame for his executions - he readily admits he's killing a baby and he's graciously arrange for the baptism of the dead in one fell swoop:

“Tiller knows exactly what he is doing. On his website, he cites that one of the ‘Three Rules of the Practice’ of late-term abortion care is ‘Time, patience, and the baby will come.’ (His italics.) The baby will come?

“I’ve saved the best for last. Tiller’s Women’s Health Care Services advertises a chaplaincy program that provides ‘sacraments such as baptism of the still born [sic] fetus and blessings for the aborted fetus.’ Yet no one—including Tiller—offers baptism or blessings for shoes or salamanders. Just kids. We called and asked why the distinction between the baptism for the stillborn and blessings for the aborted baby. Chaplain Diane Warren just laughed and said they would do whatever was requested. But of course—it’s all about choice! The kind of choice that Sebelius loves.”

Don't miss this link from the American Papist. Laying claim that social justice and wider access to abortion decreases - under Sebelius the abortion cheerleader, abortions increased:

update: thank you to the readers who have left comments and emailed me. Steven Ertelt of LifeNews:

Catholics United also claims abortions have declined under Sebelius, even though they actually went up 6.5 percent in 2006 thanks in part to Sebelius failing to support any abortion limits.

According to the Kansas Department of Health and Environment report, there were 11,221 abortions in Kansas in 2006, up from 10,543 abortions in 2005.

Pro-life groups say the increase has to do with a lack of enforcement of laws limiting late-term abortions and a court's decision to drop 30 misdemeanor charges against Tiller, who has been accused of doing the abortions without a legitimate medical reason.


Wednesday, February 18, 2009

Serendipitious Roman Adventure of Nancy Pelosi

I don't think Nancy Pelosi's meeting with the Pope lived up to her expectations.

The Catholics for Choice enterouge was hoping for a "real conversation about choice instead of this micro-obsession with abortion":

On Tuesday, Jon O’Brien, president of "Catholics for Choice," a small, well-funded organization that provides theological arguments to pro-abortion Catholic politicians, told The Hill that today’s visit between the Speaker and Pope Benedict would be an opportunity to highlight that one can be pro-choice and Catholic, and that there are much bigger issues out there to discuss, such as the fate of the poor in the global economic downturn.

"That would be a real conversation about choice, instead of this micro-obsession with abortion," O’Brien said.



Fortunately, a robust official statement from the Pope followed the meeting that made clear Nancy's agenda was ambushed for our micro-obsession of Catholics facilitating the killing of innocents.

The Vatican also ensured no photos were taken that could be misconstrued.

"His Holiness took the opportunity to speak of the requirements of the natural and moral law and the Church's consistent teaching on the dignity of human life from conception to natural death ..." a Vatican statement said. It said such teaching "enjoins all Catholics, and especially legislators, jurists and those responsible for the common good of society, to work in cooperation with all men of goodwill in creating a just system of laws capable of protecting human life at all stages of its development," it said.
It happens in every conversion.

You live a portion of your life rejecting some Truth. Rebelling, sometimes you even get yourself a good set of talking points to get others to join your rebellion.

You're as happy as a lark... until the zealots of Christendom repeat themselves reductio ad absurdum.

Then one day, the Truth penetrates your (thick) skull.

The disappointing seminal moment: When Christ promised to send the Paraclete, He didn't mean me!

What a let down.

The Paraclete is THE CHURCH!

Like a child whose limited experience doesn't understand parental guidance, curfews and discipline - and so it is with the Paraclete.

Matthew 18.

Amen, I say to you, unless you turn and become like children, you will not enter the kingdom of heaven.
Whoever humbles himself like this child is the greatest in the kingdom of heaven.
And whoever receives one child such as this in my name receives me.
"Whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in me to sin, it would be better for him to have a great millstone hung around his neck and to be drowned in the depths of the sea.
Woe to the world because of things that cause sin! Such things must come, but woe to the one through whom they come!


Was this Nancy Pelosi's seminal moment? I sure hope for her sake, it was.

Pope Benedict XVI met Nancy Pelosi, the speaker of the United States House of Representatives, at the Vatican on Wednesday, both sides said in statements -- but that seems to be all they agree on.

The Vatican says the pope lectured Pelosi about abortion and assisted suicide. Pelosi says they talked about poverty and global warming -- and she showed him pictures of her grandchildren.

Mercifully, few of us have to experience a global rebuke from the Vicar of Christ.

It's going to take a lot of humility to spiritually and intellectually process what took place in her private meeting with the Pope. There is hope and there will be prayers on her behalf from many Catholics who have long suffered public catechesis that has mislead a generation of Americans.

Pelosi's positive spin on the meeting is not being swallowed even by left-leaning Papal watchers. Vatican correspondent John Allen, who writes for the National Catholic Reporter, noted that "routine Vatican declarations after diplomatic meetings also generally sum up the range of issues discussed rather than concentrating on a particular point. In that sense, the statement can only be read as a rejection of Pelosi's statements last summer, and, in general, of her argument that it's acceptable for Catholics in public life to take a pro-choice position."

Allen also noted that "by issuing an unusual public statement after the session with Pelosi -- which insisted that all Catholics, including legislators, are obliged to work for the defense of human life from conception to natural death -- the pope also made clear there will no let-up in the pressure on pro-choice Catholic politicians to change their ways."
Did anyone really expect Nancy to release a statement saying "The Pope made clear I am in error, my soul in danger and Catholic politicians must cease and desist from abortion activism"?

Let's not kid ourselves.

Really, let's face it. Ms. Pelosi has been warned and other Catholic politicians have been placed on notice. She didn't leave that meeting without knowing she cannot accept the Blessed Sacrament without confessing her sins and amending her life.

It's her lucky day.

These days are extraordinary. Too many sheep have been led away in the vacuum of inertia. If I were a Catholic proabort pol, I wouldn't ever again be hitting the pillow after a day of abortion politics without wondering if a public proclamation of my excommunication will be forthcoming.

Est zelus domus tuae comedit me
Zeal for your house consumes me.

Tuesday, February 17, 2009

Patrick Want's to GPS Our Cars

This ought to give a boost fledling auto industry, eh?

What we need is surveillance on who is paying who's mortgage and sliding money across the table at No. 9 Park up on Beacon Hill.

I'm praying that the luminary who suggested Patrick propose the VTM comes up with several more crackerjack ideas.

There's something to be said for to pitching him a few more doozies.

How about a 27 cent tax and tracking devices on birth control pills?

Monday, February 16, 2009

Church Militant to Doug Kmiec: Gird Your Loins

Posting his rebuttal to Archbishop Chaput at the National Catholic Reporter.

The photo on the right is James Carroll. I haven't seen him in decades. When his face popped up, all I could think of was....WOW on the windows to the soul and that Linda Rondstat song...

You and I travel to the beat of a different drum,
Oh, can't you tell by the way I run,
Every time you make eyes at me...


Back to Kmiec..

It is argued by some that President Obama’s approach of using social and economic support to bolster the protection of unborn life is inadequate without a legal effort to reverse Roe v. Wade.

Some?

As in...... Archbishop Chaput's speech on February 8th?

This split in the American mind has two results. Here's the first consequence. The United States has a large and well-funded abortion industry. The industry has very shrewd political lobbyists. It also has a public relations machine that would make George Orwell's Ministry of Truth look amateur. In fact the industry runs on an engine of persuasive-sounding lies...

Here's the fourth don't. Don't create or accept false oppositions.

Dialectical thinking, and by that I mean the idea that most of our options involve "either/or" choices, is usually un-Christian. During the last U.S. election, we saw the emergence of so-called prolife organizations that argued we should stop fighting the legal struggle over abortion. Instead we should join with "pro-choice" supporters to seek "common ground."

Their argument was simple: Why fight a losing battle on the legal, cultural and moral front since - according to them -- we haven't yet made serious progress in ending legalized abortion? Let's drop the "divisive" political battle, they said, and instead let's all work together to tackle the economic and health issues that might eventually reduce abortions.

But as we look at recent American history, did Americans take a gradual, social-improvement road to "reducing" racism? No. We passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Nor have I ever heard anyone suggest that the best way to deal with murder, rape or domestic abuse is to improve the availability of health care and job training. We make rape illegal -- even though we know it will still sometimes tragically occur -- because rape is gravely evil. It's an act of violence, and the law should proscribe it. Of course, we also have a duty to improve the social conditions that can breed domestic and sexual violence. But that doesn't change the need for the law.

Likewise, if we really believe that abortion is an intimate act of violence, then we can't aim at anything less than ending abortion. It doesn't matter that some abortions have always occurred, and some will always occur. If we really believe that abortion kills a developing unborn life, then we can never be satisfied with mere "reductions" in the body count.

The U.S. Catholic bishops have argued for more than 30 years that government needs to improve the economic conditions that can lead some women to abortion. But good programs for economic justice don't ever absolve Catholics from the legal struggle to end abortion. Protecting the unborn child is not an "either/or" choice. It's "both/and." We need to help women facing problem pregnancies with good health care and economic support; and we need to pass laws that will end legal abortion. We need to do both....

In his first week in office, President Barack Obama reversed the Mexico City policy, which had blocked U.S. federal money from being used to promote abortion in developing countries. His reason for signing the executive order was that it was time to put this "divisive issue behind us," once and for all.

There's something a little odd about rhetoric that tells that we're the "divisive" ones, and lectures adult citizens about what we should challenge, and when we should stop. In a democracy, we get to decide that for ourselves. So I'm glad that a Catholic prolife congressman promptly offered a bi-partisan bill, U.S. House Resolution 708, demanding the reinstatement of the Mexico City policy. An issue that involves the life and death of unborn children and the subversion of entire traditional societies can't be "put behind us" with an executive signature.

Do read his entire what not to do's. They're good reminders about our flaws and mistakes.

It's worth posting Archbishop Chaput's to-do list in it's entirety:

Here's the first and most important do. It's very simple: Do become martyrs.

I said it was simple. I didn't say it was easy. Be ready to pay the ultimate price.

Pope John Paul II very shrewdly chose St. Thomas More, a martyr, as the patron saint of lawyers and politicians. Thomas More and his friend Bishop John Fisher, both of them executed by the same king for their fidelity to the Catholic faith, are models of how far we should be willing to go for our beliefs.

In today's world, we may never be asked to pay the ultimate price. But we do see character assassination and calumny against good people every day in the public media. And we should be ready to pay that price too. We have some very good recent examples of heroism. Two months ago, Grand Duke Henry of Luxembourg rejected a bill legalizing euthanasia passed by his nation's lawmakers.

The Duke is the grandson of Grand Duchess Charlotte, the country's heroine in World War II, and the last person to receive from a Pope the Golden Rose, the highest papal honor available to a Catholic woman sovereign.

Of course, some politicians immediately demanded that Luxembourg's constitution be changed to strip the Duke of his power.

A similar fight arose in Belgium two decades ago when the late King Baudouin refused his Royal Assent to a bill legalizing abortion. His refusal was a formality, since the king had little real power. But it was an unprecedented public act by Baudouin, who was a deeply faithful Catholic man. The Belgian Parliament declared him unable to reign. Baudouin abdicated for one day, and the bill became law without his approval.

The lesson here is that nothing, not even our good name, should stop us from doing what we know to be right.

Here's the second do. Keep hope alive.

Cultivating a spirit of Christian joy is not an act of self-deception. It's a way to acknowledge that God is on our side, and that human nature, created by God and despite the damage of original sin, is also on our side. Nothing is more inspiring than happy warriors. I hope some of you will go on the web and check out some of the photos from the annual March for Life in Washington D.C. It's an event full of prayer, charity and confidence. Many of the marchers are young, joyful people who radiate a strong hope in the future - and not the shallow hope of political sloganeering, but the real Christian hope that emerges from self-sacrifice and the struggle to do God's will.

I've never in my life seen a joy-filled pro-abortion event. And I've always found that instructive.

Here's the third do. Be strategic.

Being sheep in the midst of wolves doesn't mean we can also be dumb as rocks. Thomas More was finally a martyr -- but he was also a very adroit thinker, and a shrewd, intelligent and prudent political leader as he tried to avoid execution. Prolife organizations are always outspent by pro-abortion forces. Our efforts are dwarfed by their money. We rarely have their access to friendly media, foundations and circles of power. But this can be a blessing disguised as a curse. It forces us to be creative, long-term thinkers and extremely resourceful with our modest means.

Being strategic means planning ahead, setting the agenda, working together and outsmarting our adversaries. To achieve these goals, we need a big dose of realism. We should never dream or whine about all the things we could do with the million Euros we don't have. We need to focus on the ten Euros we do have.

Two fishes and five loaves of bread, well invested - in other words, given to the Lord -- fed a multitude. History shows that guerrilla wars, if well planned and methodically carried out, can defeat great armies. And we should never forget that the greatest "guerrilla" leader of them all wasn't Mao or Che, but a young shepherd named David, who became a king.

Here's the fourth do. Use the best means for your message, especially the new technologies.

Today's new technologies are a mixed social blessing. But they're also cheap and extremely useful tools that prolifers can use very effectively. While the traditional mainline media, including the printing press, are losing influence, blogs, social networks, and YouTube channels are thriving. And they offer huge prolife opportunities.

Here's an example. Lila Rose is a 19-year-old young woman who just received one of the six prestigious Life Prizes awarded by the Gerard Health Foundation in the United States. Since the age of 15, armed with a little courage, a lot of ingenuity, an audio recorder and a small video camera, Rose has run several undercover investigations, including one that exposed racism and a statutory rape cover-up by Planned Parenthood. Her main tool was YouTube videos that became viral and were picked up by the secular media, forcing Planned Parenthood to apologize and fire some staffers.

Lila Rose and many other agile young users of the new technologies have shown that the new internet, if used well, can break through the wall of silence prolifers often face from an unfriendly media establishment.

Here's the fifth and final do. Remember that renewing the culture, not gaining power, is our ultimate goal.

Culture is everything. Culture is our "human ecology." It's the environment where we human beings breathe not only air, but ideas, beliefs and values.

Bill Clinton's presidential campaign strategist James Carville once coined a slogan that led his boss to the White House in 1992. To keep the campaign on message, Carville hung a sign in Clinton's Little Rock headquarters that read: "It's the economy, stupid!"
It's a clever phrase, and it got the job done - if the goal was the short-term exercise of power by Bill Clinton. But that's not what prolifers are about. Our real task, and our much longer-term and more important goal, is to carry out what John Paul II called the "evangelization of culture."
Many things in the developed world today promote a spirit of greed, despair and self-delusion. Our adversaries often have far more resources than the Church and the prolife movement can possibly marshal.

But cultural trends can be changed. And I'll prove it. Mainline media have been telling us for a decade that the American public is evenly divided between those who consider themselves prolife and those who describe themselves as "pro-choice."

This is broadly true. But the devil - or in this case, God -- is in the details.

A national poll done by Harris Interactive two months ago found that fewer than ten per cent of Americans support legalized abortion on demand as it stands today. Ninety-five percent favor laws ensuring that abortions be performed only by licensed physicians. Eighty-eight percent favor informed-consent laws - in other words, laws that require abortion providers to inform women of potential health risks and also about alternatives to abortion. Seventy-six percent favor laws that protect doctors and nurses from being forced to perform or refer for abortions against their will, Seventy-three percent favor laws that require giving parents the chance to be involved in their minor daughter's abortion decision. Sixty-eight percent favor laws against partial-birth abortion. And sixty-three percent favor laws preventing the use of taxpayer money for abortions.

These figures are very revealing. They show that prolife efforts have made real progress in improving people's awareness of the sanctity of unborn life. These good results may have been impossible just two decades ago.

We need to work to change the culture. And that demands a lifelong commitment to education, Christian formation and, ultimately, conversion. Only saints really change the world. And there lies our ultimate victory: If we change one heart at a time, while we save one unborn life at a time, the day will come when we won't need to worry about saving babies, because they'll be surrounded by a loving, welcoming culture.

Will I see that day with my own eyes? I can't hold my breath that long. But then I never expected to see a Polish Pope or the fall of the Iron Curtain either. We may not see that day in our own lifetimes, but the children of your grandchildren will. The future depends on our choices and actions right here, right now, today -- together.

No matter how tired you get, no matter how hard the work becomes, no matter who praises you or who condemns you, the only thing that finally matters is this: Jesus Christ is Lord, and he came to give us life, and life abundantly. Because of the mystery of the Cross and Resurrection, the future is ours. And the best is yet to come.

God bless you!

Is it me, or is Kmiec's rebuke a "gentleman's" warning that the Obama Administration has in mind for what is permissible in the public square:


At one time, the church fathers taught that the Constitution should be interpreted in light of the “unalienable right to life” in the Declaration of Independence, though it is not apparent that this would be the legal posture of the American church today except in aspiration and prayer. To this end, there are post card campaigns against FOCA in our parishes but none calling upon Congress to propose an amendment to the Constitution to eliminate any doubt that the unborn child is a person both scientifically and legally.

Should the bishops take up this bolder calling? In times past, as I say, this was the message of the church, as it testified alongside such towering Notre Dame scholars of the natural law as Charles E. Rice and the late Edward J. Murphy. For these men of faith, the message was quite simply: “no exceptions” (which is the title of a book by Dr. Rice explaining why even exceptions for the life of the mother could contradict church teaching -- absent some fancy ethical footwork under the “principle of double-effect.”). When it came to having human law and God’s law coincide, the church stood for the Human Life Amendment.

Today the church has strategically (might it be said, prudentially in light of the perspectives of other faiths?) chosen to take incremental steps to conform human law to God’s, and perhaps that means that all of us -- the church included -- need to more charitably assess efforts to promote the choice for life premised upon social and economic support. Such support, at a minimum, should physically and materially strengthen the community, and perhaps an economically recovered America will also be spiritually revived such that the Supreme Court will once again describe us, as it did pre-Roe, as a “religious people whose institutions presuppose the existence of a Supreme Being.”

One thing for certain, as Professor Murphy once wrote: “In a sense this is a very ‘religious’ society. There are all sorts of gods. . . . [T]he question for all of us is not whether we will be guided by an ultimate authority, but who or what that authority will be. Is it to be God? Or is it to be ourselves? Or the state? Or a political party? Or a race? Or an economic class? Or the stars? Or Satan? Or what? Clearly, each of us will choose, and the choice will be consequential.”

Consequential, indeed -- under God’s law, whether or not human law is made to coincide.

At one time, the church fathers taught that the Constitution should be interpreted in light of the “unalienable right to life” in the Declaration of Independence, though it is not apparent that this would be the legal posture of the American church today except in aspiration and prayer. To this end, there are post card campaigns against FOCA in our parishes but none calling upon Congress to propose an amendment to the Constitution to eliminate any doubt that the unborn child is a person both scientifically and legally.

Should the bishops take up this bolder calling? In times past, as I say, this was the message of the church, as it testified alongside such towering Notre Dame scholars of the natural law as Charles E. Rice and the late Edward J. Murphy. For these men of faith, the message was quite simply: “no exceptions” (which is the title of a book by Dr. Rice explaining why even exceptions for the life of the mother could contradict church teaching -- absent some fancy ethical footwork under the “principle of double-effect.”). When it came to having human law and God’s law coincide, the church stood for the Human Life Amendment.

Today the church has strategically (might it be said, prudentially in light of the perspectives of other faiths?) chosen to take incremental steps to conform human law to God’s, and perhaps that means that all of us -- the church included -- need to more charitably assess efforts to promote the choice for life premised upon social and economic support. Such support, at a minimum, should physically and materially strengthen the community, and perhaps an economically recovered America will also be spiritually revived such that the Supreme Court will once again describe us, as it did pre-Roe, as a “religious people whose institutions presuppose the existence of a Supreme Being.”

One thing for certain, as Professor Murphy once wrote: “In a sense this is a very ‘religious’ society. There are all sorts of gods. . . . [T]he question for all of us is not whether we will be guided by an ultimate authority, but who or what that authority will be. Is it to be God? Or is it to be ourselves? Or the state? Or a political party? Or a race? Or an economic class? Or the stars? Or Satan? Or what? Clearly, each of us will choose, and the choice will be consequential.”

Consequential, indeed -- under God’s law, whether or not human law is made to coincide.


Today's homework for Doug Kmiec:

1. Read numer 1 on Archbishop Chaput's list.
2. Gird your loins.

Don't miss the following comment posted on the National Catholic (Abortion) Reporter:

Mr. Kmiec, would you advocate lifting legal prohibitions of other forms of murder (defined as the taking of innocent human life) in favor of social programs? At the same time, would you advocate against social programs because they might not prevent murder? Though you are right that overturning Roe vs. Wade would not make abortion illegal, and though I would argue that the Church should indeed be holding to the high moral ground in calling for a human life amendment, we still have to overturn Roe. When that happens, which it will, we will have to work on both the social and legal fronts to protect the unborn in every state. You write as if favoring Obama's social programs necessarily entails giving up the legal fight. You seem to presuppose the truth of what is really an absolute falsehood: that people who want to overturn Roe are not in favor of programs to improve the lives of all, whether pregnant or not. That is disingenuous, as you know very well the Church not only runs countless hospitals, homeless shelters, pregnancy centers, food pantries, hospitals, hospices and every other institution of love and mercy one can name. Catholic people support these works of charity, with their hands, with their money, and with political advocacy. But your effort to persuade us to give up the fight for legal protection of the unborn will be in vain. We will continue to be engaged in that fight with our hands, our money and our policial advocacy, for every minimal restriction, for the total abolition of abortion, and for the recognition of the personhood and rights of all human beings of all ages. We invite you to join us.


And from another commenter:

Please Prof. Kmiec, please,

Please Prof. Kmiec, please, please stop. For the sake of all that is good and right and just, please stop.



Kmiec is not going to stop.

Don't you see the shot he has just fired across the bow of the White House?

He's stumping for a position and letting the White House know if they appoint him, he will use his post to silence the rights of Catholic Bishops to evangelize the truth, whole truth and nothing but the truth.

Sunday, February 15, 2009

Father George Rutler's Weekly Column

From the Pastor

It would be rash to run a marathon without training. And it would not be wise to plunge into Lent without getting ready for it. The old liturgical calendar had three weeks to get ready for Lent: Septuagesima, Sexagesima, and Quinquagesima, meaning seventieth, sixtieth, and fiftieth. These were not exact configurations: Quinquagesima Sunday marks the fiftieth day before Easter, if you include both of those Sundays, and Septuagesima and Sexagesima Sundays are really 64 and 57 days before Easter. But the point is that these are signals to get ready for the gift of the Lenten season which itself is a serene anticipation of Easter joy, and therefore has a joy of its own. Saint Benedict said back in the sixth century: "In these days, therefore, let us add something beyond the wonted measure of our service, such as private prayers and abstinence in food and drink. Let each one, over and above the measure prescribed for him, offer God something of his own freewill in the joy of the Holy Spirit" (Rule, 49).

I regret that the revised calendar dropped the "Gesimas." On the other hand, those three weeks could have been confused with Lent itself, as they wore the penitential violet and left out the Gloria. But the Ordinary Form can learn from the Extraordinary Form how to start thinking about the season of penance. Most important is prayer. It helps rescue us from that spiritually idolatrous mentality which wants ashes without prayer and penance. That is rather like thinking that all you need to do in order to run the marathon is to put on your running clothes.

Prayer indicates a desire to enter into God's plan for the universe. Everything He made is cogent and has a purpose, which is why we expect the world to "work," and complain when things do not work. By doing His will, we can enter into His Kingdom—and the Kingdom is the state in which all is the way God means life to be. Perfect prayer, then, is prayer that leads us to do perfectly what God wants. God answers every prayer: and prayer is the means by which we come to realize how He has answered it.

Spiritual discipline, through acts of penance, also inoculates us against the sentimental attitude which measures reality according to our "feelings." What we feel about anything has nothing to do with what is right or wrong, and "feeling good about myself" is no guarantee that we are doing God's will. So prayer should be "instant in season and out of season" (2 Timothy 4:2) and not just when we feel like it. Our greatest dignity consists in the fact that God has made us able to think about Him, to serve Him, and to love Him. These approaching weeks of the Church year are His way of reminding us of that.