The Jesuits thought this guy's theological morass was the place they wanted to lead Catholic students.
A macabre example of the decades of malpractice by Jesuits.
I was speaking to a Catholic friend who is desperately holding onto the delusion that Pope Francis' appointment of Cardinals Kasper and Marx to lead theology on the family is naive booboo.
I asked him.
If Cardinal Kasper had spent his life encouraging people to litter the earth and pollute the ocean, do you think the Pope would announce to his see that Kasper's theology was outstanding and needs to be spread into the world?
If Kasper gave a speech to his see of Bishops about the pastoral value of seeing virtue in throwing cigarettes and empty booze bottles into the ocean, do you think for a New York minute the Pope would have stood up and applauded?
If he had, you'd think a mad man has been set loose.
Which is precisely the same conclusion many have painfully reached after observing him hand-pick a Cardinal who has spent his vocation teaching children to defile the temple of the Holy Spirit with the virtue he sees in sodomy, and asking his see of Bishops to teach this instead of the 2000 years of moral theology. What is put into the the sexual orifices of our children is much more important than what is thrown into the ocean or onto the ground.
Pope Francis, and in fact the entire order of Jesuits, know perfectly well how to exclude teachers who convey ideas of the father of destruction.
This is why you never see them appointing a warmonger to the peace and justice commissions. This is why there isn't a school or apostolate or dicastry in Christendom with a litterbug appointed to head the science department. They know perfectly well that were they to do so, they would make a mockery out of the respect for the environment we are teaching at home and would ultimately result in more children littering.
The same holds true for appointing a man that tells people to see adultery as virtuous. They know the outcome of that action debunks and mocks moral theology we teach at home. They are dividing and fracturing our children from Catholic moral theology like a vulture following the farmer planting seeds.
They are the world's leading experts in the practice of picking people for the ideas they teach to bring about the result of children believing and practicing those ideas.
Pope Francis hasn't appointed anyone who is preaching we should all resist recycling. That is intentional. He doesn't want the appointment, and the subsequent preaching to resist recycling to damage something he obviously cares about.
The same logic holds true when he has a Cardinal on his hands that is teaching his nation that breaking the commandments is virtuous. If a pope didn't want people to think breaking commandments is virtuous, he would not appoint such an individual. He would not invite that individual to teach his see. He would not sit in the audience while the individual conveyed those ideas. He would not follow the conveyance of the idea that adultery is virtue (at his invitation) with applause and instructions to distribute the skullduggery to his people on the parish level.
Nobody could ever convince anyone sane that he has the wherewithall to protect the earth from the appointment of litterbugs but he would expose his children's bodies and souls to the polluted ideas of Cardinals Kasper and Marx.
If it were an unintentional flaw in his intellect and reasoning, you would see him packing up the popemobile with dirty diapers and dumping them into the Mediterranean.
But as it stands, there is very little room to conclude anything other than the Holy Father desire to leave clean dirt under the feet of children following Cardinal Kasper's teaching that adultery is virtuous and to ensure clean air for those suffering the ill effects of the reception of the Blessed Sacrament in a state of mortal sin from the heretical theological environment he is hammering into every home.
It's very important that people attending Elton John's gay wedding have clean air to breathe. But what is even more important is a Pope that creates a theological environment that would have debunked the Catholic SCOTUS justices understanding that the Pope believes gay marriage is ok. He had 2 1/2 years to debunk the theological environment being promulgated on his behalf. He did not do it. Though he was begged.
The temptations and consequences that resulted from the theological environment is catastrophic to life and liberty, religious freedom and salvation. He has, to this day, said nothing.
At the end of the day, it all boils down to an aphorism my mother used to use when she knew I was lying to her: You can't bleep the bleeper.
The Holy Father reportedly said that the Church should limit the terms of Its Popes. I love the first comment on this thread:
Ready when you are, Holy Father. Let me know if you need help moving
Saturday, July 4, 2015
Sunday, June 28, 2015
There is nothing more profound than a priest who has spent decades zealously living out his vocation in a state of Sanctifying Grace. Their words transcend your mind to a mystical place. They reach into your soul and turn on a light.
Here's Fr. Rutler's latest which leaves little room to doubt the albatross he sees in Rome.
This is why it is important that the “Canticle of the Sun” be invoked in its entirety. The first and last three verses do not appear in the encyclical. An uninformed reader might get the impression that the saint of Assisi did not sing his song in a transport of joy to God whose glory is ineffable. “Most High, all powerful, all good Lord! All praise is Yours, all glory, all honor, and all blessing. To You alone, Most High, do they belong. No mortal lips are worthy to pronounce Your name” (verse 1). The last three verses praise the Lord for the strength he gives to forgive and to endure sickness and trial, for the mystery of death and fear of dying in mortal sin, and for serving him “with great humility.”
A satirist once described a trendy clergyman who “collects butterflies and considers the word ‘not’ to have been interpolated in several of the Commandments.” While Christ bid us to “consider the lilies of the field,” he did so not as a botanist but as the Lord who “is before all things, and in him all things hold together” (Colossians 1:17). To redact the “Canticle of the Sun” risks being left with the Sun, but without the Son.
Fr. Z adds:
How does St. Francis’ hymn end?
Woe to those who die in mortal sin!
May God have mercy on those who have caused such vast scandal.
May God have mercy on those who will fall to their baser appetites.
Everyone… pray for the deeply confused and clean your own house!
GO TO CONFESSION.
n.b. What is painfully obvious: This pope is leading souls to die in a state of mortal sin while telling them they must now turn their attention to utilizing their powers to control the weather to save themselves, listen and execute the ideas of heretics and help the communists. He's helping us all out.
Saturday, June 27, 2015
"In a national crisis, ordinary and extraordinary men can delude themselves into the commission of a heinous crime."
I listened to the Nuremberg trials today as I was doing chores. I hadn't watched the movie for years but with The ethnic cleansing of Christians and the diabolical morass in the United States, I was very interested in watching again. I never understood the hatred and moral decadence of German citizens, how the human mind and soul could function in their willful ignorance or worse, participate in the cruelty and mass murders, disposition of bodies.
With a little more experience with life under my belt, I listened carefully to the dialogue of the movie.
Many things jumped out at me.
The statement above was said by Spencer Tracy playing Chief Judge Dan Haywood. He said it in the context of explaining one would expect all men carrying out such heinous crimes to be and appear evil. But, that is not how it operates. When momentum takes over the culture of a country, men and women who consider themselves good people participate in crimes against the body and soul.
So many people claimed they did not know what was happening. Ernst Janning, a defendant on trial admitted it was a lie. He said they were present when their neighbors were dragged out of their homes and if they didn't know, it was because they didn't want to know.
After Ernst Janning incriminated himself, counsel for the defense did damage control by saying that if ordinary men should be convicted of complicit assistance to the 6 million murders, then many others are also guilty. He mentioned the quislings at the Vatican who signed a concordant with the Third Reich.
I always gave the Holy See the benefit of the doubt, but Pope Francis agreements with the communist tyrants in Cuba have relieved me of my delusion. I now have the benefit of my front row seat to the s**t show of the wealthy communists ability to use the Pope like a puppet to help spread the tyranny in Cuba to the United States.
I've read and heard all the excuses used for the concordant with the Nazis. Any way you slice it, Hitler bought public approval and silence from the Vatican so they could save their own backsides from the Crucifixion. They won their freedom from oppression by bartering the lives of 6 million people. It was wrong then and it is wrong now.
Christ didn't draw up a truce with Herod. Peter didn't sign a concordant with Nero.
I really thought Justice Kennedy would be hard-pressed to substitute himself for God and throw the structure for creating law down the toilet. I wasn't completely surprised, but it's hard to imagine anyone, even if their catechesis was crappy, positioning themselves over God as the arbiter of truth about about marriage.
Would you want your name on the short list of five people who turned the country into Sodom and Gomorrah? I honestly can't think of anyone in the history of human civilization who has done something more insidious and evil. Apart from the physical crucifixion, the offense is the darkest act in the history of Christendom.
In the world of Christ's Mystical Body, he has foisted Christ's Body upon the cross and driven the nails into his hands and feet.
What a dirty rat.
I don't know much about the history of Sodom but I am curious to know how long it took before God took action. It's going to get ugly now.
I hate to say it, but I did rationalize Kennedy's bold act of rebellion aimed at God as the fruit of the tree of Pope Francis.
You know what I loved best?
The USCCB's statement.
For over 50 years they have worked towards the goal of of yesterday's ruling. Hiring and ordaining androgynous heretics to contradict the truths of the Catholic Church, they are brazenly planning another synod to impose moral chaos on human sexuality and the Sacraments. Their statement reminded me of that scene in Casablanca when Captain Renault raided Rick's saloon and pretended to be shocked to find gambling.
“I ask all in positions of power and authority to respect the God-given freedom to seek, live by, and bear witness to the truth.”
How about you start by purging every heretic from every classroom and every parish and every apostolate?
How about plucking every last one of them out of every university?
How about you stop ordaining heretics?
How about defrocking the ones we have? God knows there is a library of complaints in every chancery.
Talk is cheap. They know full well the consequences of ordaining and hiring heretics that contradict Church teaching on their behalf. And yet, we see from the circus of the Romans they are going to keep on doing it, bolder than ever.
At the end of the day, Archbishop Kurtz's message affirms the Scriptural counsel of keeping our hand on the plow in every circumstance.
I leave you with Justics Scalia's words of wisdom:
The Supreme Court of the United States has descended from the disciplined legal reasoning of John Marshall and Joseph Story to the mystical aphorisms of the fortune cookie."
Thursday, June 25, 2015
Great news on the alleged CDF findings on Medjugorje.
They are reportedly confirming the seers are frauds. The findings are not insignificant. The faithful are banned from participating in the fraudulent simulation of the Blessed Mother's appearance and the seers are banned from reporting or publishing the "messages".
This is huge. The 'seers' will be forced over the barrel of disobedience.
The reported basis for this finding is crackpot theology in some of the messages which makes it impossible to be from the Blessed Mother, the money-making schemes they have going and the disobedience to the local bishop.
The CDF is reportedly suggesting pilgrimages not be banned because people can go there to pray in Church. Cardinal Meuller is not a stupid man, so I am guessing he knows the ramifications of flying past Fatima and Lourdes where pilgrims can obtain miracles. I am guessing they felt this would mitigate hysteria while waiting out the seers to hang themselves.
I think this is a brilliant plan.
Wednesday, June 24, 2015
I just could not get into the weeds of Pope Francis accusation that gun manufacturers are unChristian.
Meanwhile, he is acting gaga for communists, tyrants and murderers of the innocents.
Maybe he's grooming us for an encyclical about wearing shoes and fur coats as he is shoving heresies down our throats.
The big picture of ambiguity and a show about nothing for the moral leader of the world is not resonating with anyone. He is rambling on like the rest of us instead of assuming his role as a Pope and it is noticeable even to the uncatechized:
The inconsistency is unmistakeable. To bomb a railway, you need bombs. Somebody has to make them, but now he's saying the people who do such work are not practicing Christian beliefs.
This week, the Pope has not sounded analytical. He has sounded exasperated and frustrated by the world condition, and more than a little bitter.
In other words, Pope Francis sounds like most of us. The problem is that he is not like most of us. He's the Pope...
The last thing the Roman Catholic Church needs is a dull, disengaged Pope. The second-to-last thing it needs is a Vatican version of Jerry Springer or Donald Trump.
I am sorry if that sounds irreverent, which it does, but that is because I am getting exasperated and frustrated, too, and a little nervous as well. An outspoken, spirited Pope who takes an up-front leadership role has tremendous potential for good, not just to the church but the world as well.
That ancient principle - when you try to please everyone, you end up pleasing nobody. Christ gave it even more clarity. You are neither here nor there and I will spit you out of my mouth.
Tuesday, June 23, 2015
This is not really a surprise. Why would they get this close to the opportunity of destruction and execute it at their age?
I thought you would enjoy this doozy of a story.
First of all, have you noticed they are trying to portray the mission of the Church from conversion to clapping you into the arms of the devil?
The Church’s role, it says, is to accompany families.
If that isn't nutty enough, wait until you get a load of this:
as Christ did with the disciples on the road to Emmaus.
This is the road Peter used to run away from Nero like a chicken and he came upon Christ who was heading into Rome. Peter asked Christ where He was going and Christ said he was heading into Rome to be crucified again. Peter realized what he was doing and returned to Rome to be crucified.
They are trying to twist the story of Christ into some kind of cheap companion.
How about doing your job and accompanying our children to the Catechism and Sanctifying Grace?
Sunday, June 21, 2015
I have about as much zeal to read it as I could be lured to the sound of Nero's fiddle as Rome is burning to the ground.
Our friend Fr. Z tried to find something positive to say. But I couldn't agree more with Oakes Spalding who said he could find 10 things in Mein Kampf* or Stalin's memoirs that he liked.
But the person who nailed it for me is Fr. George Rutler. Below is his commentary in its entirety but the last paragraph says everything there is to say about this encyclical and this papacy.
As vicars of that Logos, popes speak infallibly only on faith and morals. They also have the prophetic duty to correct anyone who,
for the propagation of their particular interests, imputes virtual infallibility to papal commentary on physical science while ignoring genuinely infallible teaching on contraception, abortion and marriage and the mysteries of the Lord of the Universe.
I wish I could say he is ignoring his duty to teach infallible teaching on contraception, abortion, marriage and the mysteries of Our Lord but the situation is more serious as he seems to be going out of his way to throw heresies and heretics at 2000 years of teaching the tools for salvation. I don't have a lot of stamina to delve into his personal theories about the threats to dirt and leaves.
He is using heretics to lure tens of thousands into clapping fornication. The sound of Nero's fiddle is deafening to me in Laudato Si.
Fr. Rutler's weekly is below. A Hail Mary on Father's Day to this great priest and physician of the soul.
A museum curator showed me a contemporary copy of the papal bull Inter Caetera by which Pope Alexander VI divided the world between Spain and Portugal with a meridian. While not without effect, it was generally ignored. John Henry Newman’s letter to the Duke of Norfolk lists popes who were mistaken in certain policies: St. Victor, Liberius, Gregory XIII, Paul IV, Sixtus V, and St. Peter himself when St. Paul “withstood” him.
Pope Urban VIII and his advisers, in the misunderstood Galileo case, inadequately distinguished the duties of prophecy and politics, and of theological and physical science. St. John Paul II said that “this led them unduly to transpose into the realm of the doctrine of the faith, a question which in fact pertained to scientific investigation.” Father Stanley Jaki, a physicist, cautioned me against using the “Big Bang” as theological evidence for creation. On a loftier level, the physicist Father Georges Lemaître likewise restrained Pope Pius XII from conflating the parallel accounts of the universe.
Father Lemaître pioneered the “First Atomic Moment”—contradicting the prevailing thesis of a cosmological constant, or “static infinite” universe. Sir Fred Hoyle mocked it as the “Big Bang” but the term now has lost its condescension. Lemaître told the pope: “As far as I can see, such a theory remains entirely outside any metaphysical or religious question . . . It is consonant with Isaiah speaking of the hidden God, hidden even in the beginning of the universe.” It was like the counsel of Cardinal Baronius: the Scriptures teach us how to go to heaven, not how the heavens go.
Pope Francis’ encyclical on the ecology of the earth is adventurously laden with promise and peril. It can raise consciousness of humans as stewards of creation. To prevent the disdain of more informed scientists generations from now, however, papal teaching must be safeguarded from attempts to exploit it as an endorsement of one scientific theory over another concerning anthropogenic causes of climate change. It is not incumbent upon a Catholic to believe, like Rex Mottram in Brideshead Revisited, that a pope can predict the weather. As a layman in these matters, all I know about climate change is that I have to pay for heating a very big church with an unpredictable apparatus. This is God’s house, but he sends me the utility bills.
The first pope, from his fishing days, had enough hydrometeorology to know that he could not walk on water. Then the eternal Logos told him to do it, and he did, until he mixed up the sciences of heaven and earth and began to sink. As vicars of that Logos, popes speak infallibly only on faith and morals. They also have the prophetic duty to correct anyone who, for the propagation of their particular interests, imputes virtual infallibility to papal commentary on physical science while ignoring genuinely infallible teaching on contraception, abortion and marriage and the mysteries of the Lord of the Universe.
A reader sent me a copy of the indictment filed against the Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis about a week ago. I took a few days and read it.
A great deal of the misfeasance and malfeasance of enabling pedophiles was done by Bishop Harry Flynn. I found that interesting because I have yet to hear his name mentioned by the enemies of the Catholic Catechism. It further confirmed to me that so long as one encourages sleeping around, nobody will hold them accountable for ordaining and enabling pedophiles.
That being said, the conduct of many others is outrageous.
This case is a magnificent example of farcical dog and pony show of VIRTUS. How they were able to spin the focus and appoint themselves as protectors of children is positively ludicrous. I encourage you to read the indictment.
It must be kept in mind that this is the DA's case without the opportunity to present a defense, but the facts don't leave a lot of room to defend Archbishop Nienstedt's appointment and promotion of a priest with plenty of evidence in his personnel folder that convict him of being a reckless endangerment to children.
What I found surprising was the cavalier attitude of Chancery administrators and bishops to the sexual antics and criminal conduct of priests, which they caricatured as risk-taking. It explains the reasons why numerous priests live with their male lovers for decades without any actions taken by their supervisors. It explains the decades of patronizing phone calls and letters to whistleblowers. To them, the sexual debauchery of the men they ordain is nothing more than having an employee on their hands who is chasing cheap thrills.
A serious problem continues to exist in the hierarchy of our Church. The absolute unwillingness to acknowledge the real problem is exasperating.